Grand jury issues report on Clean Tahoe Program
 
Nearly $700,000 could be saved over the next 10 years if South Tahoe Refuse Co. assumed the responsibilities of the Clean Tahoe Program, the El Dorado County Grand Jury concluded in its 2007-08 final report.

"The city and county should seek a capable public or private organization to provide, at less cost, the services now provided by the Clean Tahoe Program," the grand jury report states.

The finding surprised the president and program manager of Clean Tahoe, who plan to dispute the grand jury's recommendations.

"We've got numbers and statistics to make the grand jury report, in my words, look ridiculous," said Clean Tahoe President Mike Phillips.

Clean Tahoe was founded in 1988 and provides services including picking up litter, maintaining trash bins in public places and removing illegally dumped items. It also sponsors Community Clean Up Day, in which residents can dispose of waste such as refrigerators at reduced fees, and coordinates California Coastal Cleanup Day at the South Shore.


By incorporating Clean Tahoe management payroll, as well as a variety of other costs, into the refuse company, the agencies that fund the Clean Tahoe Program - the city of South Lake Tahoe, El Dorado County, the Tahoe Resource Conservation District and Area Transit Management - could save $90,240 annually, according to the grand jury report.

The figures were developed, in part, from the review of a 2002-03 Clean Tahoe budget by South Tahoe Refuse, something that was of concern to both Phillips and Clean Tahoe Program Manager Ellen Nunes.

"You cannot do a cost comparison from 2003. Those expenses aren't accurate. I don't believe enough correct data was collected for them to make the assumption South Tahoe Refuse could do it better," Nunes said.

Representatives from South Tahoe Refuse were not immediately available for comment Thursday, but the report indicated the refuse company has been hesitant to take over the role of Clean Tahoe.

"South Tahoe Refuse is capable and willing to assume the operations of the Clean Tahoe Program if asked by the city and county to do so," the report states. "However, it has been reluctant to initiate this change because it does not wish to appear hostile to the Clean Tahoe program."

The civil grand jury provides oversight of local government, and through its reports makes recommendations for improving government operations.


The grand jury investigation follows a police department probe into the Clean Tahoe program last year. The police investigation looked at the financial practices of former program director Tim Stockton. The investigation also raised questions about whether city Councilman Ted Long, who was board president at the time, was providing sufficient oversight of the program's finances.

The police department forwarded a report on its findings to the El Dorado County District Attorney's office, which declined to file charges.

Assistant District Attorney Hans Uthe said last July that an "insufficient basis" was found to bring criminal charges associated with the police investigation. But Uthe asked the county grand jury to take a look at Clean Tahoe's fiscal and management practices.

The grand jury report states: "In the investigation of Clean Tahoe's management of funds, financial controls were found to be deficient. However, the deficiencies are in the process of being corrected."

The grand jury's report missed the intention of the original call for an investigation, Phillips said. He encouraged further investigation into the former management of the program.


Clean Tahoe's board will develop a detailed response to the grand jury findings during their regularly scheduled meeting April 24.

The program's two major funders also expect to review the findings at upcoming meetings.

"Obviously, we can't afford not to look at that and find out if those numbers are accurate," said South Lake Tahoe Mayor Mike Weber. "It is our fiduciary responsibility."

Weber said he was going to wait and hear all the evidence before taking a stance on the future of the program.

The full council is likely to discuss the grand jury's findings during the next city council meeting April 15, Weber said.

The findings also are likely to be discussed by the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors in May, said Supervisor Norma Santiago. Environmental Management Department staff received the report earlier this week and are reviewing the findings before issuing a recommendation to the board about whether to follow the grand jury's recommendations.


 

Copyright  2006 BWB. All rights reserved.